4 ms·
So are people getting cancer more or less that they were in 1991?
by ladzoppelin 12y ago
So are people getting cancer more or less that they were in 1991?
- ArkyBeagle 12y ago"For those years, deaths from cancer also decreased by 1.8 percent among men and fell by 1.4 percent among women." I hate to be this way, but as horrible as cancer is, the modes of death behind it are not to be ... advertised. My mother in law went to Alzheimers. Wouldn't wish that on anyone. As Hank Williams said, "I'll never get out of this world alive".
- ladzoppelin 12y ago"Deaths" decreased but what about cases of cancer? Is it constant? EDIT: Found this exert after going through the whole Cancer Institute pdf: " The overall rate of cancer cases (incidence) remained stable for women between 2007 and 2011, but declined by 1.8 percent per year for men. Men experienced relatively rapid declines in cases of colon cancer (3.6 percent per year), lung cancer (3 percent per year) and prostate cancer (2.1 percent per year) during that period, the report found. But there's been no change in incidence rates for breast cancer. And the report found that certain cancers are even on the rise. For example, thyroid cancer cases increased an average 4.5 percent per year between 2007 and 2011, and liver cancer cases have increased by more than 3 percent. The increase in liver cancer cases is largely due to hepatitis C infection, mainly through intravenous drug use and sharing needles in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, Jemal said. The rise in thyroid cancer cases cannot be easily explained, Jemal said. Some suspect the condition may be now overdiagnosed due to the overuse of imaging scans and ultrasound, he said, but there's also been an increase in the size of cancerous lesions found. "For thyroid, it's very difficult to explain what's occurring," he said"
- tsotha 12y agoThere's really no good way to die. About the best you can do is a massive coronary in your sleep.