5 ms·
From the first section, I'd personally recommend only reading the two 2011 papers by Shapiro et al. The other three just rehash descriptions of the same TreeDoc
by ahelwer 12y ago
From the first section, I'd personally recommend only reading the two 2011 papers by Shapiro et al. The other three just rehash descriptions of the same TreeDoc data structure, and are only interesting if you want to get some historical context behind the idea (upshot: recent developments were motivated by collaborative text editing). The list also ignores Baquero et al's earlier work on state-based CRDTs (also only relevant if you care about historical context).
Also, I've been working on putting together the CRDT wiki page[0]. I'd love to hear feedback on the talk page!
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict-free_replicated_data_type https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict-free_replicated_data_...
- cmeiklejohn 12y agoI wouldn't say "ignored", given that implies I purposefully omitted the article. I merely forgot to add them. Pull requests welcome! https://github.com/cmeiklejohn/cmeiklejohn.github.io https://github.com/cmeiklejohn/cmeiklejohn.github.io