3 ms·
...and with almost absolute predictability anything that even remotely challenges Musk/Tesla is down-voted on HN. This is a legitimate question. This robotic
by rebootthesystem 12y ago
...and with almost absolute predictability anything that even remotely challenges Musk/Tesla is down-voted on HN.
This is a legitimate question. This robotic snake problem is solving a problem that does not exist.
And, please, don't invoke the handicapped card as someone already did. They manage just fine today. Anyone, handicapped or not, who qualifies to drive a car can handle plugging a cord into a socket. A 7 year old kid can do it.
So why throw a $30,000+ robot at a non-existing problem. I'll tell you why:
Musk understands marketing. With oil prices so low and nothing significant coming out of Tesla they all but evaporated from public view. There is/was no news to be had about Tesla. The SUV is tanking. That's a non-story. So, how do we get people talking about Tesla again. We put out outrageous-yet-brilliant-sounding futuristic ideas that are easy to consume by the average Joe and blog writers can parrot liberally. Musk/Tesla sound like geniuses and the general public doesn't even take a millisecond to apply critical thinking to what they just read.
The ONLY way a complex robotic auto-charge system might have a tenuous level of applicability is in the context of self driving cars AND "driven" by people so extremely handicapped that they would not be allowed to drive a car today. In other words, paraplegic, severe Parkinsons or other ailments.
That scenario is decades away. And, even then, a simple drive-on docking station would be far cheaper, reliable and easier to install than some kind of a robotic snake rig.
I love technology as much as anyone on HN and i have been involved in industrial and educational robotics my entire adult life. Yet, I have to be honest with myself and not treat everything like a nail just because I have a hammer.
So Tesla will sell you a $30,000 robotic snake for your $80,000 car while Toyota will probably sell you a $3,000 floor-mounted docking station for their $30,000 car. And so will all other manufacturers. Because it makes sense.
- greglindahl 12y agoCan you give a reference for the snake costing $30,000? I don't see it mentioned in Elon's tweet, or any of the articles about it.
- slayed0 12y agoAllowing the car to be charged with no human interaction in paramount to creating a system of driver-less cars. Imagine the car drops you off at work and then parks itself in a charging area a few blocks away where it can plug itself in. (this is just a theoretical example of course but I hope it demonstrates the value of a system like this).
- jobposter1234 12y agoI think the reason you got downvoted is not that you criticized Musk, but the tone of your comment is inappropriate for this forum. Your comment reads as though it were written by a blowhard who is not only too certain of their own perspective, but also not interested in having a discussion to learn more.