3 ms·
Drunk driving has become a huge social stigma in the UK over the past few decades. People will report drunk drivers, even their friends and relatives, as they s
by cmdkeen 12y ago
Drunk driving has become a huge social stigma in the UK over the past few decades. People will report drunk drivers, even their friends and relatives, as they see it is a social good. They still exist but the incidence of it has deceased rapidly.
Scotland has just reduced the drink drive alcohol limit even further to the point where you effectively can't have any alcohol all day if you're driving.
Given the mention of the Swedish rate between tests and positive results for breathalysers I imagine they have the same laws as the UK. The police in the UK can breathalyser anyone:
a) who has committed a moving traffic offence
b) involved in a road traffic collision
c) who the officer suspects of having alcohol (any) in their system
Most police forces require their officers to breath test if they have grounds, and while many police officers don't like dealing with traffic offences almost all of them will go out of their way to stop drink drivers. Given almost every driver commits a moving traffic offence every so often there is pretty much always grounds to test anyone (you don't have to actually prosecute for the offence, i.e. crossing a mini roundabout, just over the speed limit etc).
- PJDK 12y agoThere is very much a social stigma. I remember being quite shocked when I lived in Canada a few years ago, and people would tell stories that would end "I don't even remember driving home that night". That just wouldn't be acceptable back home (or at least in equivalent social circles). To get onto wild speculation and anecdote, I noticed that anti-drink drive adverts in the UK tend to focus on how horrific it would be to be responsible for killing someone, whereas in Canada they focused on what the penalties would be if you were caught.