4 ms·
40%, since some days. :) http://www.livescience.com/49133-super-efficient-solar-energy-system.html http://www.livescience.com/49133-super-efficient-solar-energ
by lucidstack 12y ago
40%, since some days. :)
http://www.livescience.com/49133-super-efficient-solar-energy-system.html http://www.livescience.com/49133-super-efficient-solar-energ...
- imaginenore 12y ago44.7% actually http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a5/PVeff%28rev141208%29.jpg http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a5/PVeff%28r... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cell_efficiency http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cell_efficiency
- jsilence 12y agoAh, nice graph! Thanks for posting! I was unaware about the steady progress. Still far away from the 90+% thermal efficiency that is possible with solar heating. My hopes on photovoltaics are on the relatively new contender Perovskite. Really nice to see the steep progress in efficiency there.
- imaginenore 12y agoThe theoretical limit for solar cells is much lower than 100%: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shockley%E2%80%93Queisser_limit http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shockley%E2%80%93Queisser_limit
- jsilence 12y agoAh, nice graph! Thanks for posting! I was unaware about the steady progress. Still far away from the 90+% thermal efficiency that is possible with solar heating. My hopes on photovoltaics are on the relatively new contender Perovskite. Really nice to see the steep progress in efficiency there.