> I think the poster means that c# has many functional features Yeah just like C++ or Java now have "functional features". That doesn't make them functional la

> I think the poster means that c# has many functional features Yeah just like C++ or Java now have "functional features". That doesn't make them functional languages, they don't promote functional programming to the extent that Scala does. Aside from that, their type systems are much too unexpressive to allow for the style functional programmers are used to, not to mention they promote mutability.