3 ms·
> This website is simply _enabling_ people who intend to > violate this (potential) term of their airline ticket > agreement. Which might, in some jurisdicti
by A1kmm 12y ago
> This website is simply _enabling_ people who intend to
> violate this (potential) term of their airline ticket
> agreement.
Which might, in some jurisdictions, open the website operators to claims of tortious interference (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tortious_interference https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tortious_interference) if they can prove that the site operator knew about the contractual term and incited people to breach it.
Hopefully a term requiring someone to take a flight is unenforceable (if such a term even exists) - so that might give them a defence even if such a term exists.
- quesera 12y ago> if they can prove that the site operator knew about the contractual term and incited people to breach it. Notably, the contract didn't yet exist at the time of involvement of the site operator. At the point of ticket purchase / contractual agreement, the site operator is not involved, and in fact the operator has no knowledge of whether a contract was entered at all.