11 ms·
Ground based radar is blind below the horizon, and generally blind near the horizon. At 3.2km (2 miles) up the horizon is 202km away. At 12m (40ft) for a groun
by electromagnetic 12y ago
Ground based radar is blind below the horizon, and generally blind near the horizon.
At 3.2km (2 miles) up the horizon is 202km away. At 12m (40ft) for a ground based radar (pulled that out of my arse, just for an example) the horizon is at 12.4km.
Then we discuss things like the Clutter Zone, which is a big issue for ground based radar systems. Planes and helicopters can fly Nap-of-the-Earth - below about 500ft is the usual stated height - because everything from buildings to wind over 15mph can make it unreliable for ground based systems.
An elevated system eliminates most of these problems, and this system has a radar horizon that covers all water and land from DC out to the Atlantic coast.
There's a lot of areas where a submarine could launch from unnoticed, and I'm guessing trying to detect a sub in busy waters is a lot harder and less reliable than a radar system to target a missile launch and try to take down a short range ICBM.
- hga 12y agoOr a nuclear tipped supersonic missile like the Mach 3 Sunburn (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-270_Moskit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-270_Moskit), or back in the '80s I heard of the concept of using SLBMs in a "depressed trajectory" mode, where they didn't really get up high but used their rocket energy to travel horizontally really really fast. Putting these sorts of defenses in D.C. is in part about avoiding a "decapitation" attack.