12 ms·
I think Taylor Swift said it best, Remember: Fingerprint locks are convenient, but they discard your ability to "forget" or refuse to unlock a device. They rem
by mkal_tsr 12y ago
I think Taylor Swift said it best,
Remember: Fingerprint locks are convenient, but they discard your ability to "forget" or refuse to unlock a device. They remove consent.
[ source - https://twitter.com/SwiftOnSecurity https://twitter.com/SwiftOnSecurity / https://imgur.com/a/1PDRJ https://imgur.com/a/1PDRJ / ]
Can anyone intent on downvoting explain what is factually wrong or misleading about the quote in the picture? Just because it's on a picture doesn't make it less valid.
- Raphmedia 12y agoWait, what? I'm out of the loop there. Is that a meme, or is Taylor Swift really saying this?
- mkal_tsr 12y agoIt's a meme by that twitter account
- Houshalter 12y agoIs it a meme if it's just text on an image? It has to at least be multiple people doing it to be a meme.
- mkal_tsr 12y agoI just chose the not 100%-false option of the two ;-)
- frozenport 12y agoIts a time honored tradition, see Britney Spears' Guide to Semiconductor Physics [*] http://britneyspears.ac/lasers.htm http://britneyspears.ac/lasers.htm
- calvin_c 12y agoIf the subject you'd like to bring to discussion is the quote, post the quote. If you want to bring up a humorous Twitter account dealing with security concerns, post the Twitter account. Reposting a meme posted by that account doesn't serve either purpose very well.
- mkal_tsr 12y agoI posted the original source from the creator, the Twitter account which made the Imgur album. I have swapped the .jpg with the text quote ... I just find it odd HN is so primary-source averse.
- patal 12y agoIf the subject you'd like to bring to discussion is no humour on HN, post no humour on HN. If you want to bring up your confusion about how Taylor Swift and security go together, just say so. Gruntling away in your post doesn't serve either purpose very well. You're being mean to parent.
- dfxm12 12y agoI didn't downvote, but your post is off topic. If the article was about a case where a person was mandated to unlock their phone because it is only protected by a fingerprint scan, (and of course a person cannot "forget" their fingerprint like they can a password), then your quote would have been on topic. Yeah, the quote is about fingerprints, but it's really orthogonal to the topic of the article, which is that fingerprints can be "cracked" just like passwords. That's not what the quote you posted is about. The quote is about the fifth amendment (of the US constitution): https://www.eff.org/issues/know-your-rights#17 https://www.eff.org/issues/know-your-rights#17
- mkal_tsr 12y agoYou don't think the ability to use photographs of hands/fingers and used for fingerprint readers is relevant to a quote about using fingerprints as passwords has a security gap of consent? I'm sorry but what? We've seen many times that fingerprint readers can be fooled, and pointing out that pictures of hands/fingers could be used against you is highly relevant to a decision of securing something with fingerprints or not.