4 ms·
It's Michens' MOSSAD/not-MOSSAD question[1]. Any half-decent encryption will protect you from bulk collection and monitoring, but if you're targeted, you lose.
by username223 12y ago
It's Michens' MOSSAD/not-MOSSAD question[1]. Any half-decent encryption will protect you from bulk collection and monitoring, but if you're targeted, you lose.
[1] http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/people/mickens/thisworldofours.pdf http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/people/mickens/thisworld...
- peterkelly 12y agoThat has to be the best paper I've ever read
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- STRML 12y agoI thought you were joking, but I had to click anyway. You're right, this paper is fantastic. I thought Micken's stopped writing, I'm so glad he didn't.
- merrua 12y agoThat was fun. I'm going to read all the rest of his stuff now. Thats dangerous linking, username223.
- Intermernet 12y agoWow, I think Mickens may oversimplify a few points for comedic effect, but that is a wonderful read!
- Jacqued 12y agoAmazing
- throwawayaway 12y agohere's another i read some time ago https://www.usenix.org/system/files/1309_14-17_mickens.pdf https://www.usenix.org/system/files/1309_14-17_mickens.pdf i don't know how he gets paid to write these. perhaps as class clown for the fine folks at microsoft research? in any case, very amusing.
- username223 12y agoHe does real systems research: http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/people/mickens/ http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/people/mickens/ He just also has a sense of humor, and makes time to exercise it.