3 ms·
Meh. When I saw those '1's in the 'Hacker' style I hoped for an actual collaborative filtering but this seems to be merely a feed aggregator. That I don't need
by fishnchips 12y ago
Meh.
When I saw those '1's in the 'Hacker' style I hoped for an actual collaborative filtering but this seems to be merely a feed aggregator. That I don't need - I'm familiar with RSS and its readers.
On the other hand collaborative filtering and comments would add some actual value. More value for sure than the ability to change styles (all equally ugly BTW).
- icebraining 12y agoThe advantage of feed aggregators is that they allow you to get content from feeds added later, without having to manually find them and subscribe. A mechanism for dynamic OPML - a "feed of feeds" - would be better, but as far as I know there's no such format.
- fishnchips 12y agoThe value of it is IMHO marginal. The value of dynamic OPML on the other hand is strictly negative, especially if it was recursive (you'd subscribe to a dynamic feed that could subscribe you to other dynamic feeds etc.) - a perfect storm of data.
- icebraining 12y agoI don't think it should be recursive, and certainly limits could be imposed. Apparently it's also already a reality, though I wasn't aware; it seems both InoReader and Feedly already support them.