> Go through the exercise of cracking an SRP authenticator to see the problem with this logic. There are mathematical proofs of SRP's security. Yes, there are

> Go through the exercise of cracking an SRP authenticator to see the problem with this logic. There are mathematical proofs of SRP's security. Yes, there are some issues with some implementations of SRP, but those are problems with implementations, not with SRP. Frankly, this is just one of those arguments at this point where it's clear you don't actually understand the fundamentals of security and you're too committed to your argument and too proud to admit you don't know. Since you can't actually make an argument, you're just presenting me with difficult/impossible tasks and claiming that if I did them it would prove your point, knowing full well that I won't do them. If you actually were knowledgeable on this topic, you could explain it: I have explained everything I said so far. > Weirdly, despite saying upthread that I must not know how SRP works to say what I'd said, you now say that you're not familiar with SRP. I don't know all the exact implementation details of SRP, but I do understand the general architecture. The problem is that the devil in security is often in the details. I know enough to know the limitations of my knowledge. The important thing for the sake of what I'm saying is that I know what problem SRP is trying to solve. > If not: happy to learn something new. The only thing I'm going to try to teach you at this point is this: if you're going to even bother forming an opinion on something technical, you had better be damn sure you're right. Because if you're wrong, it's human nature to react negatively when someone tells you you're wrong, so you'll try to argue about something you're wrong about, and the result is: you'll never learn, and you'll probably impress some people who know even less than you, but you'll embarrass yourself in front of anyone who actually knows what they're talking about, and you'll limit your progress as an expert in your field. You'll never get smarter until you stop trying to prove how smart you already are.