> Sure, but the same logic could be be applied to Rolling Stone for the UVa hoax. Eh, I don't think it's the same line of reasoning though. Rolling Stone has

> Sure, but the same logic could be be applied to Rolling Stone for the UVa hoax. Eh, I don't think it's the same line of reasoning though. Rolling Stone has some very serious pieces that are well researched, with sources cited. They made a mistake in trusting a source, which is embarrassing, but doesn't detract from their overall seriousness. Fox and Friends is a show that peddles propaganda and talking points in-between hokey feel-good stories. It just isn't journalism.