Does the economy exist for society or does society exist for the economy ? > We're talking about macro issues here. We want as many companies as possible to su

Does the economy exist for society or does society exist for the economy ? > We're talking about macro issues here. We want as many companies as possible to succeed. This is a "society exists for the economy" answer to the question. The whole point of the economy is to decide division of resources. If that means you don't get any as a CEO, well then you should just get the same treatment as a person entering your store without money. Congress is not talking about increasing elite programmer visas (those visas exist, require extraordinary support for the visa, ie. extraordinary pay or extraordinary credentials, so these people are not a problem IF you're willing to pay). They're talking about letting the Indian "consulting"(what they call it)/slavery(what every sane person calls it) do double or triple the amount of work they do now. WIPRO will be the main beneficiary of this. I find it kind of hard to believe that companies actually complain about this. But from a perspective of "more money for me (NOW), not for you" it makes sense. From a perspective of maximizing our countries opportunities I would argue it does not (by itself) make sense.