2 ms·
I would counter and say NoScript is still an option. I want to control what sites I allow to execute scripts in my browser rather than give global authority to
by _JamesA_ 12y ago
I would counter and say NoScript is still an option.
I want to control what sites I allow to execute scripts in my browser rather than give global authority to any random site I may happen to land on.
I see no value in allowing scripts from Facebook or Twitter, for example, to run on any of the sites I visit.
- jccalhoun 12y agoI would agree with the op that noscript is not an option any more but only because I think the widespread use of javascript makes it mandatory for sane web use.