4 ms·
You should migrate to umatrix (https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/%C2%B5matrix/ogfcmafjalglgifnmanfmnieipoejdcf https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail
by elvis635 12y ago
You should migrate to umatrix (https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/%C2%B5matrix/ogfcmafjalglgifnmanfmnieipoejdcf https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/%C2%B5matrix/ogfcm...), http switchboard is not maintained anymore
- hrjet 12y agouMatrix is new and improved, and I use it sometimes, but it is still rough around the edges. Some websites don't work and there's no work-around. Edit: To clarify, the above is in comparison to HTTPSB.
- gorhill 12y agoFrom the doc: "µMatrix does not guarantee that sites will work fine: it is for advanced users who can figure how to un-break sites, because essentially µMatrix is a firewall which works in block-all/allow-exceptionally mode out of the box: it is not unexpected that sites will break" Workaround is to un-block whatever net requests which are causing a site to break. I can't make sense of "no work-around": unblock everything? Edit: There is a scope-based switch to completely turn off matrix filtering.
- hrjet 12y agoHi, I am well aware of the matrix and a fan (have been a HTTPSB user and now test uMatrix sometimes). I am also a contributor to https://gngr.info https://gngr.info which has a Request Manager inspired by the matrix. I was referring to a few issues I encounter in uMatrix which are not present in HTTPSB. I probably should log them; was not sure if uMatrix is ready for full-time use yet.
- not_with_retard 12y agoExample of a site that you can't get working?