3 ms·
My point is that they are criticizing him for his good deeds which are already done, because he did not instead do a good deed which only in their hindsight app
by readme 12y ago
My point is that they are criticizing him for his good deeds which are already done, because he did not instead do a good deed which only in their hindsight appears to be a better alternative. It's purely ridiculous to criticize someone in this manner.
The appropriate thing to do would be to write an open letter to Gates encouraging him to instead invest in basic services now, since what he's already done cannot be changed, nor is it worthy of such criticism.
- dogma1138 12y agoThis is a news article, I haven't seen any indication in the article that they actually covered a specific case of criticism. As it seems to me this is more of a case of reporters conducing research on the effects of donation and the direct intervention medical industry in Africa and presenting the negative effects it might have. The Bill and Melinda Gates tag is a "click bate" which has nothing to do with it being an internet article. Virtually every news article these days and for as long as i can remember needs a hook and this is a fairly easy one to boot. Is it completely fair? probably not, is it grossly wrong? not really...