3 ms·
If consistency and reliability matters I would probably avoid GlusterFS like the plague. (things may have changed now but I worked with it in a petabyte scale b
by jpgvm 12y ago
If consistency and reliability matters I would probably avoid GlusterFS like the plague. (things may have changed now but I worked with it in a petabyte scale bioinformatics cluster and it was not fun)
Look at Ceph if you want to store files in a consistent and distributed fashion. Not the filesystem though, the object store (RADOS).
- mattbillenstein 12y agoI had trouble with Gluster - and the Ceph filesystem as well. But MooseFS was solid.