> And does the literal number "95%" substantively change the argument... Given PG used that number in the article's title, and even in its URL, it does seem li

> And does the literal number "95%" substantively change the argument... Given PG used that number in the article's title, and even in its URL, it does seem like it's worth debating. If the number was actually 50% as the parent suggests, then suddenly you have a very different argument.