4 ms·
Charity has limits. When you're using terms which are very heavily politically and emotionally loaded to label people who disagree with you, you're going to ge
by waterlesscloud 12y ago
Charity has limits.
When you're using terms which are very heavily politically and emotionally loaded to label people who disagree with you, you're going to get that sort of response back.
You can't be deliberately uncharitable to people and then say, "But you should be charitable when you respond!"
- dang 12y ago"Charity" as in the Principle of Charity has a specialized meaning. It isn't about being nice (though we should do that too). It's about keeping discussions substantive. Since that is the raison d'etre of Hacker News threads, I do indeed think we can expect HN commenters to be charitable in this sense.
- waterlesscloud 12y agoAnd for the most part substantive posts get substantive comments. This just isn't a substantive post. It's full of loaded language, highly questionable assertions, and doubtful anecdotes.
- read 12y ago(1) You objected to the term "anti-immigration". If that phrase could be changed to something else that roughly means "oppose immigration" what phrase would you have used? (2) If a phrase that you suggest is used, would this allow you to focus on the substance of the argument?