47 ms·
Sorry man. Obviously you don't understand how canaries are supposed to work, otherwise you wouldn't have posted in this thread to begin with. I used NSL as a g
by lawl 12y ago
Sorry man. Obviously you don't understand how canaries are supposed to work, otherwise you wouldn't have posted in this thread to begin with.
I used NSL as a generic term. I'm not american either, doesn't change anything.
But seriously please stop posting. You're doing more harm than you help.
You can't know IF something happened. Posting a public statement that nothing happened just puts the people that might know under more pressure. There is a good reason you can't update the canary yourself. Because if you could, it wouldn' work.
I cannot take your company serious that way.
Next time send the SMS without any public statement please.
- spacefight 12y agoRight. He has no clue on how the warrant canary setup works normally. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrant_canary http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrant_canary "A warrant canary may be posted by the provider to inform users of dates that they have not been served a secret subpoena. If the canary has not been updated in the time period specified by the host, users are to assume that the host has been served with such a subpoena."
- StavrosK 12y agoNo, you have no clue on what I'm talking about. How many people's data will get compromised if someone forgets to update a canary? Zero. The only way for a canary to fail catastrophically is for the owner to update it after the servers have been compromised, thus revealing sensitive data. I'm not talking about trust in a company or how this makes one look. I'm talking about protecting people's data, and failing to update a canary doesn't compromise that.
- dang 12y ago> He has no clue > No, you have no clue Come on, lads.