4 ms·
This got posted to slashdot and from the discussion there, it appears likely that this is not true. http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1401739&cid=297
by kniwor 17y ago
This got posted to slashdot and from the discussion there, it appears likely that this is not true.
http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1401739&cid=29725537 http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1401739&cid=...
http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1401739&cid=29727119 http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1401739&cid=...
We had a similar incident with the kids who had a hair solar panel. Not knowing much about superconductors, I had no idea what to look for. This being HN, I somehow expected the submitter to be knowledgeable enough.
Can we have some submitter guidelines for preventing people from posting such stuff. Digg and reddit fail pretty regularly at preventing this and it would be great if HN could dodge this bullet.
- TrevorJ 17y agoGuidelines exist and can be viewed here: http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html I felt that the veracity of the claim itself would be an interesting discussion on HN. It's been talked about on other sites but we tend to have more informative and knowledgeable discussion here than happens elsewhere so I felt that it was worth posting if only to be able to discuss the deeper implications and the nuances of why, specifically something like this may in fact be impossible as claimed. As the guidelines say: "If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity." There are also some guidelines about the appropriate way to handle submissions that are off-topic which might be helpful to you.