4 ms·
I doubt there's any serious risk of criminal liability here. The key for most crimes is showing (human) intent (by the coders, the operators, or someone). The i
by andrewfong 12y ago
I doubt there's any serious risk of criminal liability here. The key for most crimes is showing (human) intent (by the coders, the operators, or someone). The intent to purchase random items for art via some automated process isn't the same as the intent to purchase drugs for personal use.
That said, if you decide to keep any drugs you get from the not rather than immediately disposing of them, you've demonstrated the requisite intent to be guilty of possession, so there's that.
- JoeAltmaier 12y agoI thought intent was important for sentencing, but not for assessing innocence? If its clear you killed a guy, then you are guilty of something. Whether its 1st degree or manslaughter depends on intent.