3 ms·

Then you'll have to refuse to stay at Hilton hotels too: http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=60001005951 http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=600010059

by cge 12y ago

Then you'll have to refuse to stay at Hilton hotels too: http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=60001005951 http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=60001005951 . Cisco, Aruba, Ruckus, Smart City, the Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee have similarly come out in favor of allowing wireless operators to attack other wireless operators. Interestingly, the National Cable and Telecommunications Association filed in opposition to the petition, with a rather strongly worded filing.

_delirium 12y ago
It's not surprising to me that Cisco would weigh in in favor of this being allowed, since managing "rogue" APs is one of the features they advertise on some of their enterprise stuff.
christoph 12y ago
In my opinion Hilton is just about the worst hotel brand out there. I actively refuse to stay there at any opportunity. They wanted to charge me 10 euros to use the gym when I stayed in one recently (this was a discounted rate as well because I'm a member of Hilton Honours), regular price for guests was 20 euros. For one use of the gym!! That's not far off what I pay for a month of 24/7 gym access at home. Wifi was 25eu a day. A small bottle of water from the mini bar was 8 euros, a small coke 12 euros. A pretty average chicken ceasar salad from the restaurant was 35 euros. It's just crazy when you/your company are already paying 350 euros a night for a room.