Im sorry, I was a bit angry because I felt like you did not even read my argument. > 150 years ago was a vastly different time. I don't care if they were wrong

Im sorry, I was a bit angry because I felt like you did not even read my argument. > 150 years ago was a vastly different time. I don't care if they were wrong THEN. Back then they didn't even have computers and motors were inefficient. Time and technology have changed. I agree. But simular argument can be made for every decade since then. Im not arguing that it WILL go on, Im arguing that we have no reason to belive that it will stop soon. Im not hearing any new arguments and the data does not really fit the 'automation' story. So my question is, why is it diffrent now, and 'now we have tech X' is not good enougth.