2 ms·
What about RIOT [1], Contiki [2] or TinyOS [3]? [1] http://riot-os.de/ http://riot-os.de/ [2] http://www.contiki-os.org/ http://www.contiki-os.org/ [3] http://
by pantalaimon 12y ago
What about RIOT [1], Contiki [2] or TinyOS [3]?
[1] http://riot-os.de/ http://riot-os.de/
[2] http://www.contiki-os.org/ http://www.contiki-os.org/
[3] http://www.tinyos.net/ http://www.tinyos.net/
- duaneb 12y agoOf those, it seems like only TinyOS would qualify (a full userland stack that you can develop from) under the same qualifications that netbsd might qualify.... To be clear, by "true os", I mean a posix runtime, preemptive multitasking with threads and processes, memory protection. Still, cool links (I'll save that TinyOS for later this week), and I like the username.
- revelation 12y agoMost 8 bit micros don't have an MMU, so you can't have memory protection or virtual memory. That's a hardware limitation.
- duaneb 12y ago> so you can't have memory protection You can if you emulate all memory.... I had never considered that solution before, that was my original point :)
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- pantalaimon 12y agoI think you will like NuttX [1] even more :) [1] http://www.nuttx.org/ http://www.nuttx.org/