4 ms·
It's also a maintenance nightmare. A LOT of that code is terrible, there's a lot of tight coupling, and a heavy reliance on developers with pagers to keep the m
by Tamerlin 17y ago
It's also a maintenance nightmare. A LOT of that code is terrible, there's a lot of tight coupling, and a heavy reliance on developers with pagers to keep the mess operating.
There's a reason that they have such insane turnover so few people who stick around after they collect their signing bonuses...
- spazmaster 17y agothanks, that's some interesting information. that does strengthen the OP's case. Loose coupling should be possible but a rarely seen feat I reckon for websites of this scale. I wonder how "loosely" coupled and well architected the 2.0 sites are like digg and facebook?
- aaronblohowiak 17y agoYou can read about facebook's architecture at highscalability and other sites of that ilk.
- zaphar 17y agoAre you speaking from experience?