If you judge your programming languages based on personal aesthetics of the 'beauty of the code', you're wondering off into lala land. Go has a better syntax t

If you judge your programming languages based on personal aesthetics of the 'beauty of the code', you're wondering off into lala land. Go has a better syntax that rust, objectively, because it refuses to create new operators that are not orthogonal to existing ones. That makes it easier to parse because there are fewer 'code synonyms' (eg. the rust Fn<(Arg1, Arg2), (Rtn)> is identical to Fn<Args, Arg2> -> Rtn; to be fair go has its share of these irritations as well; eg. x := 1, vs var x = 1; but fewer of them) It's got nothing to do with how pretty or ugly the code is.