3 ms·
Your username is venturegiant. The url of the post is venturegiant, and you're commenting as if you're talking to a 3rd person? Your intro video (which is act
by brk 17y ago
Your username is venturegiant. The url of the post is venturegiant, and you're commenting as if you're talking to a 3rd person?
Your intro video (which is actually kind of annoying) says you are the "leading online solution for pitch ideas" (or something like that). Yet it looks like the site has been up for about a year. Quite an accomplishment that is...
Oh, and it looks like I have to pay a fee to get any real value out of the site.
Just what the industry needs, more fee-based VC "helper" services out there masquerading as something useful.
- grellas 17y agoTop-tier VCs and their spin-offs have generally had excellent reputations, which they strive to preserve. At the other end, successful entrepreneurs who later choose to seed selective startups are the best "angels" because they look to add value to a process they understand (and from which they seek to profit as the startup profits). In between are the lower-tier VCs and the "organized" angels - a no-man's land that has occasional pockets of opportunity but that is more often than not treacherous for startups who may wander into it. My experience with institutional angel investors is that they should be approached with great caution. Some may offer value but caveat emptor.