3 ms·
i also disagree with that statement, while amusing, it's untrue. you can use C++ without the things I have mentioned quite safely. in fact the less features you
by throwawayaway 12y ago
i also disagree with that statement, while amusing, it's untrue. you can use C++ without the things I have mentioned quite safely. in fact the less features you use, the less they interact and the safer the whole experience is.
- angersock 12y agoYou know what we call (C++)--? C. :)
- throwawayaway 12y agoyou should actually preincrement there to avoid the copy constructor, the correct formulations is (++C)--
- angersock 12y agoHow do you know that my preincrement and postincrement are the same? ;) Well played, at any rate.