3 ms·
That wasn't one of the approved techniques. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/12/09/list-13-enhanced-interrogation-techniques-used-by-cia-on-detainees/ http://www
by joshuaheard 12y ago
That wasn't one of the approved techniques.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/12/09/list-13-enhanced-interrogation-techniques-used-by-cia-on-detainees/ http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/12/09/list-13-enhanced-interr...
Tell me which one of the approved techniques fits the definition of torture.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2340 http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2340
- jrochkind1 12y agoIt is something that apparently happened, approved or not. Does that not trouble you, that such a thing could happen, by those charged with upholding our liberty and safety, and there is nothing done to make sure it never happens again? Do the survivors, or the families of those killed, deserve some kind of apology or compensation? We could argue about the 'approved techniques', as actually implemented, constituting torture too (I think they do, and think if they were done to you you'd agree -- I think your opinion is based on confidence that they would NEVER be done to you because they are only done to 'bad people', and the goverment would never confuse you for a 'bad person' -- you're probably right, only because you're American and white; in fat there are _numerous_ cases of 'mistaken identity' among those who were kidnapped and tortured), but really, neither of us are going to win such an argument on the internet.