3 ms·
There is lots of rambling on the text. But from the tone of it, and from the actual text, I could understand: 1) They claim that US State Department helped in
by speeder 12y ago
There is lots of rambling on the text.
But from the tone of it, and from the actual text, I could understand:
1) They claim that US State Department helped in the creation of "The Interview" and that the movie promotes terrorism.
2) They claim that the Sony hack was perpetrated by terrorists, because terrorism breeds terrorism.
3) They claim they have nothing to do with the Sony hack, although they approve it.
4) They claim they are really, really angry at US behaviour of accusing them, and they will retaliate, including militarily.
Interestingly enough, they don't mention their own networking getting killed.
- quink 12y ago> 3) They claim they have nothing to do with the Sony hack, although they approve it. Nope, they just say that the US shouldn't jump to conclusions, that they've never performed a "cyber-attack" on "south Korea" (which is irrelevant here) and that they don't know who the "GOP" are or where they are. No denials apart from that.
- speeder 12y agoThe FBI argument is that they are the culprit because the attack was similar to the attack on south korea. So they are denying both attacks.