5 ms·
That's the entire point. Anyone attributing an action to "them" inherently wrong in doing so. "Because Anonymous has no leadership, no action can be attributed
by BHSPitMonkey 12y ago
That's the entire point. Anyone attributing an action to "them" inherently wrong in doing so.
"Because Anonymous has no leadership, no action can be attributed to the membership as a whole. Parmy Olson and others have criticized media coverage that presents the group as well-organized or homogeneous." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_%28group%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_%28group%29)
- n09n 12y agoThat quote and the wikipedia article it comes from are both misguided because they still describe Anonymous as a group.
- darkstar999 12y agoThat's partially my point. However, when you do something under the name "Anonymous" like the twitter account did, you are doing it as Anonymous, the "loosely defined group". Otherwise why would you call yourself Anonymous? I am Anonymous right now. I am legion.
- n09n 12y agoIt's a loosely defined group only in the sense that some people incorrectly define it as a group.
- duaneb 12y agoOk, lemme define the group: Anonymous: the group of people who identify themselves as part of the group "Anonymous".
- n09n 12y agoAh yes, the good old set A, which contains all elements who are members of set A.
- darkstar999 12y agoYes, that is my point.