6 ms·
Why not use xxHash? https://code.google.com/p/xxhash/ https://code.google.com/p/xxhash/ Docs say it hits over 13GB/sec on a Core i5 3340M @2.7GHs. Or if this
by MichaelGG 12y ago
Why not use xxHash?
https://code.google.com/p/xxhash/ https://code.google.com/p/xxhash/
Docs say it hits over 13GB/sec on a Core i5 3340M @2.7GHs.
Or if this is an older design decision, why not use MurmurHash, which is also pretty fast and has been around for a while.
- seiji 12y agoThat's almost like answering "do you want chicken or steak?" with "I'd like a balloon!" The article didn't pretend to compare all possible options, it aimed to improved exiting options while maintaing backwards compatibility. Redis doesn't make design decisions based on what's fast, it prefers to use what's simple.