Further, his subsequent posts to the mailing list[1] are missing the canary entirely, but everything has been addressed except for: > 3. The DC has confirmed v

Further, his subsequent posts to the mailing list[1] are missing the canary entirely, but everything has been addressed except for: > 3. The DC has confirmed via Twitter that the servers were not "accessed". Having been raided in the past I know indeed they can be forced under Dutch law not to inform clients of raids, but I don't feel this may be the case. With that being said, a chassis intrusion indicator still must be addressed and I cannot find it in the logs anymore. The DC company are not the people who I directly interact with however so I am still awaiting a direct response form those we host the server with. Either way, it's not a direct raid or seizure, if anything a backdoor installed by someone at the DC, but honestly at this point you have to accept the possibility and either accept/balance/mitigate the risk or get new hardware. [1]: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2014-December/036084.html https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2014-Decembe...