3 ms·
simpler, cheaper, healthier alternate solution: have no cats
by mkramlich 12y ago
simpler, cheaper, healthier alternate solution: have no cats
- stephencanon 12y agoAlso a much more boring option. Pretty sure our cats have paid for themselves many times over in free entertainment.
- mkramlich 12y agohaving cats is not free. and there are tons of entertainment options, the vast majority of which don't shit, smell, scratch, bite or significantly increase the chance of children or the unborn being with infected with a mind-altering brain parasite. but yes, agreed, cats can do cute things, petting is fun, and feeling them purr is great. just have to weigh the trade-offs and beware of alternatives.
- mkramlich 12y agofactually true comments should never be punished down to -1. HN's voting system is broken and too easily abused by people being jerks, helping to reinforce groupthink
- cbd1984 12y agoYour comment is not factually true, it is a matter of opinion, and it's jerkish besides. We don't need someone coming in to reel off facts in a jerkish fashion. Facts aren't that hard to find.
- mkramlich 12y agofactually true, on-topic, helpful comments like mine should never be punished down to -4. HN's voting system is broken and too easily abused by people being jerks, helping to reinforce groupthink shame on anyone that contributed to that. you're part of why HN has such a hateful, obnoxious sub-culture that drives more mature people away
- mikeash 12y ago"factually true, on-topic, helpful comments like mine should never be punished down to -4." Why not?
- zyx321 12y agoI'm sorry, but no; your comment was not in any way helpful to anyone here. People don't pick their hobbies purely based on cost. Suggesting "quit your hobby" / "pick a cheaper hobby" as a solution for any problem other than "I literally can't afford to pay my rent any more" makes you seem like a pretentious asshole, and even then, the way you phrased it was just plain rude.