You are building your argument on flawed assumptions such as "attracting highly talented students capable of such feats is expensive". There are no shortage of

You are building your argument on flawed assumptions such as "attracting highly talented students capable of such feats is expensive". There are no shortage of smart and intelligent candidates capable of paying being turned down at Harvard for a less capable minority on financial aid. And you are somehow arguing that Universities should be settling for dumber but richer minorities?? How is this not following the conversation correctly?