3 ms·
Looking forward to using this once IE8 drops off the radar (never mind IE10). I considered using it with fallbacks, but deemed it to be not worthwhile since A)
by _greim_ 12y ago
Looking forward to using this once IE8 drops off the radar (never mind IE10). I considered using it with fallbacks, but deemed it to be not worthwhile since A) I had to limit flexbox to whatever the alternate scheme (display:table-cell in this case) could do, B) I was basically maintaining and debugging two separate layouts at that point.
- leephillips 12y agoBut it doesn't work in IE 9, right? Isn't that a big chunk of audience?
- jonrimmer 12y agoDepends on where you source your browser usage statistics, but IE9's share is smaller than IE8's. For example, caniuse.com[1] has IE8 on 3.18%, and IE9 on 2.13%. Later versions of IE (and Windows) are better at auto-updating, and people using them seem to be more willing to upgrade. I'm lucky enough to work for a company with a last-2-versions support policy for IE, meaning IE10 and 11 are all I have to worry about. I can't understate how much nicer it makes web development. So much of the bad reputation of web technologies stems from wrestling bugs in old versions of IE and the lack of proper layout capabilities in CSS. [1] http://caniuse.com/#search=flex http://caniuse.com/#search=flex
- apaprocki 12y agoIn case you want a more "mainstream" sample, I see this on bloomberg.com: IE9 6.20%, IE8 4.09%, IE11 3.80%, IE10 3.12%, IE7 0.42%
- jonrimmer 12y agoTo be clear, the caniuse.com stats are sourced from StatCounter Global Stats[1], not from the site itself, so they should be fairly reliable, albeit averaged across the world. Obviously, nothing beats measuring for your own site and audience. [1] http://gs.statcounter.com/ http://gs.statcounter.com/