3 ms·
I take the complete opposite approach. It sounds more like a conspiracy theory to take the FBI's word on this without significant evidence. Just like with any o
by aqme28 12y ago
I take the complete opposite approach. It sounds more like a conspiracy theory to take the FBI's word on this without significant evidence. Just like with any other alleged crime, the skeptical view (innocent until proven guilty) is best.
- Xeoncross 12y agoyou have no right to question the question
- mikeash 12y agoThe skeptical view is to say "I don't know" until you have enough evidence to know. Innocent until proven guilty is how the courts operate, it's not a guide to skepticism. The skeptic's reaction to an alleged crime without sufficient evidence to prove innocence or guilt should be, "I don't know." Many (most? all?) of the contrarians on this issue are basically saying, the FBI can't be trusted, and they are wrong. That's not skepticism, that's just being contrary.