I like articles like this. Some sort of artificial lens you can look through and get some sort of insight. It may or may not be a thorough description of everyt

I like articles like this. Some sort of artificial lens you can look through and get some sort of insight. It may or may not be a thorough description of everything, but these simple lenses are sometimes surprisingly useful. An exercise here would be to find out if you're complimentary to one or the other. Wikipedia is extremely complimentary to pull/search for example. The New York Times is complimentary to push. Mechanics would usually be more comfortable advertising via pull, under 7s ballet is would usually be more comfortable advertising via push. Push advertising has a bad name because of bland TV brand recognition stuff, but it's actually good for a lot of things. The internet gives us a lot of "push" that is less stupid. You don't initiate, but you do need to play along. Novel concepts need push. Kickstarter is push. Oculus Rift needed push to get going. HN is push. Anyway, an interesting insight is that push's "content durability" is "flow."