2 ms·
I really do hope that the FBI's "secret" evidence was quite a bit more substantial than this. I'd like to know what it was—it's really irrational to accuse some
by 0942v8653 12y ago
I really do hope that the FBI's "secret" evidence was quite a bit more substantial than this. I'd like to know what it was—it's really irrational to accuse someone, especially the North Korean government, and with no one to verify their claim, the FBI does not seem smart. Of course they may have no secret evidence at all and are making this up which is much, much, worse.
- LunaSea 12y agoApparently they have weapons of mass destruction too. /s
- thret 12y agoWell, yes, they do: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Korea_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Korea_and_weapons_of_mass...
- fpp 12y agosaid the Kuwaiti nurse https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmfVs3WaE9Y https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmfVs3WaE9Y
- brazzy 12y agoUm, nope. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vC4m6BB2gZ4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vC4m6BB2gZ4
- classicsnoot 12y agoImplying no agreement or dissent, can you give another source besides RT? This station is dubious at best...
- mikeyouse 12y agoIt's pretty well known that NK is testing nuclear weapons: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_North_Korean_nuclear_test http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_North_Korean_nuclear_test (Unless I misunderstood your question)
- fintler 12y agoAs someone who's attended classified FBI infosec briefings in the past (nothing related to this hack), my opinion is that they probably have very substantial evidence.
- differentView 12y agoWell that's good enough for me! Competent government agencies never mislead the public.