Weak sauce. The paper seems to be looking for non-objective liberally biased judgements. The problem with that is that discriminating between objective measur

Weak sauce. The paper seems to be looking for non-objective liberally biased judgements. The problem with that is that discriminating between objective measures and value judgements can be done without descending into conspiracy theories. It's appropriate to question objectivity, please continue to do so. But start by first building a strong evidence base and methods to identify problems independent of politics.