4 ms·

Same holds for btrfs.

• bensummers 12y ago
  Didn't CoreOS just remove btrfs because it tended to break? Also: https://rudd-o.com/linux-and-free-software/ways-in-which-zfs-is-better-than-btrfs https://rudd-o.com/linux-and-free-software/ways-in-which-zfs...
  • cmurf 12y ago
    The cited article has a. nothing to do with CoreOS, and b. contains very incorrect information about btrfs, not just a matter of also being outdated. e.g. "btrfs does not allow you to organize subvolumes" has never been true. The article must be old because send/receive, deduplication, and preliminary raid56 support have been there for a while.
  • digi_owl 12y ago
    Damn ironic, given that Poettering wants to build a whole OS using cloud containerization and BTRFS. And CoreOS depends heavily on Poettering's systemd (to the point that they have built their own containerization system on top of it).