It's just factual. You're both denigrating the value of the linked article based on not knowing about Paul Graham's NYT quote. Even if there were no such speci

It's just factual. You're both denigrating the value of the linked article based on not knowing about Paul Graham's NYT quote. Even if there were no such specific, personally identifiable quote -- should we deny that there are v.high-level players in SV who indulge in and (apparently) support ageism?