4 ms·
There is a new phrasal verb “be a thing” which lets us conveniently talk about such constructions. That is, “now and then” is a thing—an idiom, with a specific
by evincarofautumn 12y ago
There is a new phrasal verb “be a thing” which lets us conveniently talk about such constructions. That is, “now and then” is a thing—an idiom, with a specific meaning outside the wording—but “then and now” is not a thing.
You will note that all of the semantic constraints they propose place the item with a “positive” aspect first—I wrote a blog post about this[1].
There is also a related notion of “stormy petrel”[2] which I wrote a poem about[3] back when I had lots of hair.
[1]: http://evincarofautumn.blogspot.com/2014/08/adjective-valence-and-linguistic.html http://evincarofautumn.blogspot.com/2014/08/adjective-valenc...
[2]: http://www.kith.org/logos/words/lower/petrels.html http://www.kith.org/logos/words/lower/petrels.html
[3]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRlpRFs2L30 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRlpRFs2L30
- baddox 12y agoAs a side note, "then and now" is actually a common phrase used to describe comparisons of old and recent depictions of the same subject, e.g. photographs of celebrities.
- evincarofautumn 12y agoD’oh, you’re right. A better example is “cat and mouse” versus “mouse and cat” from the paper.