2 ms·
Is this about Analysis paralysis vs. learning by doing? From what I understand of asian philosophy, I think the dichotomy between he Confucean and Taoist valu
by fsloth 12y ago
Is this about Analysis paralysis vs. learning by doing?
From what I understand of asian philosophy, I think the dichotomy between he Confucean and Taoist value systems is a very good mental tool - the former stresses academic learning and analysis while the latter strives for simplicity and doing what you can, right now, with the knowledge and tools you have.
To draw a caricature: The confucean systems hold the bureaucracy that keeps systems going for decades in the highest regard while a taoist would value the spontaneity of an "agile and lean" system the most.
I think the "wu wei" concept is linked to a situation where a person has an intutive understanding of a system and it's practical degrees of freedom and constraints, and thus can let his subconscious to perform most of the heavy lifting, versus a situation where for one reason or another the person does not have a lucid mental model of the field where he tries to work and proceeds through constant conscious cognitive evaluation. I might completely off in my understanding, though.
- anon4 12y agoI think you can actually unify both. That is, have both a system that lasts for decades and have people move with spontaneity. The key is to disentangle the system which dictates how things fit together from people's personal lives. The system needs specific roles filled, but the people filling them don't have to be the roles themselves and further, the system itself must evolve, driven by the changes in the people that are in it.