3 ms·
I'm sure that a good number of people have requirements that OpenNTPD can't satisfy. However, for most home or office users I'm sure it's good enough. E.g. her
by PhantomGremlin 12y ago
I'm sure that a good number of people have requirements that OpenNTPD can't satisfy. However, for most home or office users I'm sure it's good enough.
E.g. here's my OpenBSD firewall, which syncs to a number of NTP servers on the net (including pool.ntp.org and time.apple.com):
$ rdate -npv clock.isc.org
Fri Dec 19 18:23:11 PST 2014
rdate: adjust local clock by 0.012466 seconds
And here's an internal OS X desktop running Mountain Lion. It doesn't talk to any NTP servers on the Internet, only to my firewall system running OpenNTPD:
$ ntpdate -qu clock.isc.org
server 149.20.64.28, stratum 1, offset 0.011798, delay 0.05516
19 Dec 18:24:43 ntpdate[2000]: adjust time server 149.20.64.28 offset 0.011798 sec
$ ntpq -p
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
==============================================================================
*xxxxx.yyyyyyyy. 4.2.2.3 4 u 307 512 377 0.223 5.384 2.611
Being synced to within 12 milliseconds of a reliable stratum 1 NTP server is good enough for me. NB: I don't normally use clock.isc.org, there are plenty of stratum 2 and higher servers available for use.