3 ms·
I am going to skip the counting part since I think it is borderline pedantic and doesn't lead anywhere. Defining what a culture is, or how you differentiate the
by phn 12y ago
I am going to skip the counting part since I think it is borderline pedantic and doesn't lead anywhere. Defining what a culture is, or how you differentiate them is not on the scope of my comment, and the argument was not about cultures specifically.
I don't need an historical example, since I am not arguing that this has always been the case, nor that it isn't a cultural change.
Going a bit further on my previous comment, and trying to clarify, I think this behavior emerges precisely because of a general stabilization/stagnation of a given population (of traits, languages, behaviors, animal species etc.) in order to avoid over-fitting (the "won" part, if I did not express myself clearly enough) and to preserve diversity.
The original comment is just that, a comment. A thought that I think holds some value and is related to the article. I am not trying to convince anyone that this is a defined mechanism by which nature rules and defines itself.
- dalke 12y agoIt is a lot of fun to be rationalist and deep thinker. It lets one ponder great schemes of how ideas work together. Without empirical grounding, it can also lead one drastically astray. You have no examples that your thought is true, nor any mechanism by which it could work, while I have both counter-examples and the observation that any such mechanism is outside of known evolutionary theory. "I am not arguing that this has always been the case" stands in stark contrast to your proposition that "we are wired" to this behavior.