4 ms·
Mlpack: A C++ machine learning library
- zo1 12y agoHas anyone actively used this for any project (big or small)? Looks like the project has 10K+ commits, so we can reasonably assume it's mature.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- karmacondon 12y agoI've used it, it's great. My main interest was using some of the regularization methods, which all worked as expected. I was able to talk to some of the maintainers on IRC, very responsive and tolerant of my stupid questions.
- belch 12y agoHere's a list of some (academic) uses of mlpack: http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?cites=17794023163287158191&as_sdt=80005&sciodt=0,11&hl=en http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?cites=17794023163287158191&...
- gtank 12y agoDevelopment of mlpack has been going on for at least 7 years and my impression is that it's pretty mature. It was originally affiliated with a lab at Georgia Tech, where its current maintainer (a friend of mine) is a PhD student. The dual-tree methods are based on his research.
- garbage_stain 12y agoThe project is currently in a state of transition to Github from svn, which explains the lack of issues and presence. http://www.mlpack.org/ http://www.mlpack.org/ has links to all of the old development tools such as Trac (http://www.mlpack.org/trac/ http://www.mlpack.org/trac/) which will be ported to Github soon.
- tunnuz 12y agoWhy is the project relying on boost::random, instead of using std::random? Is there a specifically reason for such a choice?