6 ms·
Although I can't argue whether this article is aimed at the technically inclined or not, I do believe that the advice is equally applicable for both parties. J
by ABrandt 17y ago
Although I can't argue whether this article is aimed at the technically inclined or not, I do believe that the advice is equally applicable for both parties.
Just because "business people" can't put together a brilliantly coded working product, does not mean that they can't do anything to get their venture started. Who is to say that setting up a legal entity, researching market trends, and securing sales channels is any less productive activity than programming?
I know that this is not a popular view, but in my eyes there are two distinct sets of tasks in a startup. Yes, one is the tech side and the other is the business side. Both pieces need to be in place to maximize chances for success though. Is a heavily tech-centric startup with a beautiful beta and no business model in any better of a position than a non-tech startup with a well thought out sales strategy and a static landing page as a minimum viable product?
As important as having complimentary skill sets is, I also believe that having some overlap isn't a bad idea either. A hacker who can read a statement of cash flows paired with an MBA who knows an 'if' statement from a 'while' loop will ultimately be able to work better together.
- wheels 17y agoOh, usually I'm the person that's out defending that business folks can contribute quite a lot to a startup. I'm just questioning the logic that you need to do things that way, as the article implies, and not based on some fuzzy notion of utility, but just looking at the history of successful startups. Some have business people on the founding team; a lot don't.